ArticleCureus2024
An In-Vitro Study on the Impact of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) and Laser-Activated Bleaching Techniques on the Color Change of Artificially Stained Teeth at Varying Time Intervals.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Tooth color is a key factor in the perception of an attractive smile, making bleaching a widely sought-after cosmetic dental procedure. Valued for its minimally invasive approach, this technique effectively lightens teeth to achieve desired aesthetic outcomes. As the desire for immediate results grows among patients, various bleaching agents, and energy sources have been developed to expedite the bleaching process. The study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 35% hydrogen peroxide activated by light-emitting diode (LED) and laser on artificially stained teeth, assessing color changes at different time intervals. Methodology Sixty maxillary central incisors with intact crowns were selected for the study. An artificial staining solution was prepared, and the samples were immersed in it for 15 days to simulate staining. After this period, the teeth were removed from the solution, rinsed with water, and dried. Baseline photographs of each tooth were taken for comparison. The teeth were then divided into two groups, one treated with LED activation and the other with laser activation of 35% hydrogen peroxide as the bleaching agent. The color changes were measured and recorded at different time intervals. Data were presented as mean and standard deviation, with statistical analysis conducted using independent sample t-test and repeated measures ANOVA to compare the efficacy of the two methods. Results Both LED and laser activation of 35% hydrogen peroxide demonstrated significant color changes in the stained teeth. The initial color improvement was noticeable in both groups, with LED and laser treatments producing comparable whitening effects. The mean color change values indicated that both activation sources were effective in enhancing the bleaching process, providing immediate and substantial results. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two methods, suggesting their equivalency in clinical efficacy for tooth bleaching. Conclusion The study concludes that both LED and laser activation of 35% hydrogen peroxide are efficient methods for in-office tooth bleaching, providing immediate and enhanced whitening effects. The comparable results between the two energy sources indicate that can be effectively used to meet the increasing demand for rapid aesthetic improvements in a clinical setting. This finding supports the adoption of both LED and laser bleaching techniques as viable options for dental practitioners aiming to achieve optimal patient satisfaction with minimal invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.