ArticleCureus2024
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Insights From a Single-Center Experience in North India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD4- and CD8-to-Total Lymphocyte Ratios to Guide Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Induction in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Feasibility Study.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- From Challenge to Opportunity: ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation to Expand the Donor Pool at a Single Center.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is frequently utilized as an induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Full-dose rATG induction therapy (7-10 mg/kg) has been associated with increased morbidity. However, definitive data on the appropriate rATG dosage remains scarce. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of varying rATG doses in KTRs. Methodology A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted between 2009 and 2014 in a cohort of 208 KTRs who received rATG induction therapy. Patients included in the study had received two to three consecutive doses of rATG as part of their planned induction protocol. Participants were categorized into the following two groups based on the cumulative dosage of rATG received during induction therapy: group A received 2 or 2.5 mg/kg, while group B received ≥3 mg/kg. The five-year follow-up data were analyzed. Results A cumulative rATG dose of 2 or 2.5 mg/kg and ≥3 mg/kg was given to 122 and 86 patients, respectively. The incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes, total graft loss, death, and death-censored graft loss was 6.25%, 3.84%, 7.21%, 4.32%, and 2.88%, respectively. Two malignancies and 141 infectious complications were noted. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding DGF, total graft loss, death, death-censored graft loss, infectious complications, and incidence of acute rejection episodes. Deceased donor kidney transplantation was identified as a significant predictor of acute rejection episodes (odds ratio = 9.19, 95% confidence interval = 1.567-53.907; p = 0.014). Conclusions The dosage for rATG induction therapy for KTRs should be tailored based on immunological and other factors impacting graft survival, along with a comprehensive risk assessment for potential infectious complications. A cumulative dose of 2.0 or 2.5 mg/kg could be optimal, offering effective induction therapy in KTRs with excellent graft survival rates and potentially fewer infectious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.