ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Diagnostic Efficacy of Computed Tomography in Appendicitis Cases With Negative Ultrasound Findings.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysing YouTube as a health resource: quality and reliability of videos on pediatric appendicitis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute appendicitis (AA) is a prevalent cause of abdominal pain, and accurate diagnosis is critical to prevent complications such as perforation. While ultrasound (USG) is often the first imaging modality, its limitations necessitate alternative approaches, particularly in cases where USG results are negative. OBJECTIVES AND
aimsThis study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in identifying appendicitis in patients presenting with negative USG findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Pondicherry, India, involving 70 patients with clinically suspected appendicitis and negative USG results. All patients underwent CT imaging, and findings were analyzed to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy.
resultsOf the 70 patients, 35 were diagnosed with appendicitis based on CT findings, yielding a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 65.71%, a PPV of 74.47%, an NPV of 100%, and an overall accuracy of 82.86%. The study also identified other conditions, such as mesenteric lymphadenitis and ureteric calculus, in patients with negative appendicitis diagnoses.
conclusionsCT is a highly effective imaging modality for diagnosing appendicitis in patients with negative USG results. The use of CT significantly aids in clinical decision-making, reducing the rates of unnecessary surgeries and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.