Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435217›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Comparing CD10 Expression With the Clinicopathological Features and Hormone Status of Invasive Breast Cancer.

Aravindan Kumaravel, Muthuvel Esakki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aravindan KumaravelPathology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Muthuvel EsakkiPathology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Worldwide, female breast cancer is the most common cancer (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal, prostate, and stomach. Breast cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer-related mortality, with lung cancer being the leading cause. In India, breast and cervical cancers are the two most common cancers among women. This study was undertaken to analyse the expression of CD10 in invasive duct cancer (IDC) and its correlation with the various clinicopathological features and hormone status. Materials and methods This study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital on 42 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma - no special type (IDC NST). The clinical and histopathologic parameters such as age, tumor site, tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, lymph node metastases, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion were assessed in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of the tumor tissue along with the hormone status of positivity for ER, PR and Her2Neu. These parameters were subsequently compared with the expression of CD10 in the corresponding slides and statsitical correlation was done using the chi square test. Results The most common age group was more than 40 years, with 41-50 years, and 51-60 years in particular. CD10 was positive in 93% of cases. There was a positive correlation between CD 10 expression and lymphovascular invasion in the study (p-0.006). There was no significant relationship between hormone status and CD10 expression. Conclusion A significant association was seen between CD10 expression and lymphovascular invasion. No relation was found between CD10 and the other parameters such as tumour grade, lymph node metastases, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and hormone status. Further studies are required to explore the potential of CD10 as a prognostic marker for IDC.

Indexed as

cd10 markerimmunohistochemistry(ihc)invasive ductal cell carcinomaprognosisstromal cd10

Identifiers

PMID39435217
PMCPMC11492156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.