ArticleCureus2024
Clinicoepidemiological Profile of Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose In previously performed studies, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has been shown to occur postpartum. As a result, mechanical ventilation and oxygen dependence were eventually connected to the development of ROP in these preterm children, and ROP prevalence is on the rise globally. Despite various improvements in childcare, ROP still tends to arise due to various risk factors associated with the disease. So, clinically the research was performed to determine the clinical and epidemiological profile of ROP. Materials and methods A total of 268 participants were to be enrolled in the study. It was an observational, cross-sectional study carried out at Department of Ophthalmology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Veer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Burla, Sambalpur, Odisha, India. Ethical approval was provided on 30 November 2019. Results Overall 123 (46%) infants out of 268 infants developed retinopathy of prematurity. Majorly, the infants had stage 1 and stage 2 ROP. Most of the infants were male. Birth weight in ROP patients was 1000 g or less in 54% of infants, 1000-1500 g in 46% of infants and >1500 g in 33% of infants. Gestational age was found to be a predictor of retinopathy of prematurity. The adverse events that were found to be associated with retinopathy of prematurity were sepsis (53%), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (54.6%), intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) (60%), anaemia (61.5%). Conclusion It has been observed that babies with higher birth weights and older gestations are also susceptible to developing ROP. Therefore, the greater birth weight newborns up to 1750 g and older gestational age babies >34 weeks should also be included in the screening criteria, especially if they have risk factors such as oxygen supplementation, sepsis, RDS, and anaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.