Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435192›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Harnessing Corneal Stromal Regeneration for Vision Restoration: A Comprehensive Review of the Emerging Treatment Techniques for Keratoconus.

Zoya Javed, Sachin Daigavane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zoya JavedOphthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sachin DaigavaneOphthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disorder characterized by thinning and conical protrusion, leading to visual impairment that often necessitates advanced treatment strategies. Traditional management options, including corrective lenses, corneal cross-linking (CXL), and surgical interventions such as corneal transplants and intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), address symptoms but have limitations, especially in progressive or advanced cases. Recent advancements in corneal stromal regeneration offer promising alternatives for enhancing vision restoration and halting disease progression. This review explores emerging techniques focused on corneal stromal regeneration, emphasizing cell-based therapies, tissue engineering, and gene therapy. Cell-based approaches, including corneal stromal stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells, are promising to promote tissue repair and functional recovery. Tissue engineering techniques, such as developing synthetic and biological scaffolds and 3D bioprinting, are being investigated for their ability to create viable corneal grafts and implants. Additionally, gene therapy and molecular strategies, including gene editing technologies and the application of growth factors, are advancing the potential for targeted treatment and regenerative medicine. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including technical limitations, safety concerns, and ethical considerations. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these innovative approaches, highlighting their current status, clinical outcomes, and future directions in keratoconus management.

Indexed as

cell-based therapiescorneal cross-linkingcorneal stromal regenerationgene therapykeratoconustissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39435192
PMCPMC11492026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.