ArticleOphthalmology science
A Computational Framework for Intraoperative Pupil Analysis in Cataract Surgery.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Biomarkers Using a Portable, Home-Based Eye-Tracking System to Predict Short-Term Visual Fatigue Deterioration: Prospective Observational Feasibility Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- Cha-PO and CVNet: a hybrid approach for automated cataract detection using adaptive feature selection and deep learning for high accuracy and efficiency.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CatSkill: Artificial Intelligence-Based Metrics for the Assessment of Surgical Skill Level from Intraoperative Cataract Surgery Video Recordings.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Pupillary instability is a known risk factor for complications in cataract surgery. This study aims to develop and validate an innovative and reliable computational framework for the automated assessment of pupil morphologic changes during the various phases of cataract surgery. Design: Retrospective surgical video analysis. Subjects: Two hundred forty complete surgical video recordings, among which 190 surgeries were conducted without the use of pupil expansion devices (PEDs) and 50 were performed with the use of a PED. Methods: The proposed framework consists of 3 stages: feature extraction, deep learning (DL)-based anatomy recognition, and obstruction (OB) detection/compensation. In the first stage, surgical video frames undergo noise reduction using a tensor-based wavelet feature extraction method. In the second stage, DL-based segmentation models are trained and employed to segment the pupil, limbus, and palpebral fissure. In the third stage, obstructed visualization of the pupil is detected and compensated for using a DL-based algorithm. A dataset of 5700 intraoperative video frames across 190 cataract surgeries in the BigCat database was collected for validating algorithm performance. Main Outcome Measures: The pupil analysis framework was assessed on the basis of segmentation performance for both obstructed and unobstructed pupils. Classification performance of models utilizing the segmented pupil time series to predict surgeon use of a PED was also assessed. Results: An architecture based on the Feature Pyramid Network model with Visual Geometry Group 16 backbone integrated with the adaptive wavelet tensor feature extraction feature extraction method demonstrated the highest performance in anatomy segmentation, with Dice coefficient of 96.52%. Incorporation of an OB compensation algorithm improved performance further (Dice 96.82%). Downstream analysis of framework output enabled the development of a Support Vector Machine-based classifier that could predict surgeon usage of a PED prior to its placement with 96.67% accuracy and area under the curve of 99.44%. Conclusions: The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework (1) provides high accuracy in pupil analysis compared with human-annotated ground truth, (2) substantially outperforms isolated use of a DL segmentation model, and (3) can enable downstream analytics with clinically valuable predictive capacity. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.