Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435126›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Estimating the benefit of esketamine nasal spray versus real-world treatment on patient-reported functional remission: results from the ICEBERG study.

Albino J Oliveira-Maia, Benoît Rive, Yordan Godinov, Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02497287 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-label, Long-term, Safety and Efficacy Study of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2015 to 2017Enrolled802ConditionsTreatment-resistant DepressionArmsEsketamine (Intranasal Spray), Duloxetine (Oral Antidepressant), Escitalopram (Oral Antidepressant), Sertraline (Oral Antidepressant), Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) (Oral Antidepressant)
NCT03373253 completednot on this map

Treatment-Resistant Depression Cohort in Europe

TypeobservationalSponsorJanssen-Cilag Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled830ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trajectory of response to esketamine nasal spray for treatment resistant depression: Findings from ESCAPE-TRD.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albino J Oliveira-MaiaChampalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Benoît RiveJanssen EMEA, Paris, France.
Yordan GodinovJanssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Siobhán Mulhern-HaugheyJanssen EMEA, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) affects approximately 10-30% of patients with major depressive disorder, and most patients with TRD do not respond to real-world treatments (RWT). Treatment with esketamine nasal spray (NS) plus a selective serotonin or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) has significant long-term clinical benefit over RWT in patients with TRD. However, the impact on patient-reported function remains to be determined. Methods: The ICEBERG analysis was an indirect treatment comparison performed using data from two studies of patients with TRD: SUSTAIN-2 (esketamine NS; NCT02497287) and the European Observational TRD Cohort (EOTC; RWT; NCT03373253; clinicaltrials.gov). Here, patient-reported functional remission, assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), was defined as SDS ≤6 at Month 6. Analyses were conducted using propensity score re-weighting and multivariable models based on 18 covariates. Results: At Month 6, the probability of functional remission in esketamine NS-treated patients from SUSTAIN-2 (n=512) was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8-29.4), while the adjusted probability for RWT patients from the EOTC (n=184) was 11.5% (95% CI 6.9-16.1; relative risk: 2.226 [95% CI 1.451-3.416]; p=0.0003). In the total combined population (N=696), patients who did not achieve clinical response or remission had a low probability of achieving functional remission (5.84% and 8.76%, respectively). However, for patients who did achieve clinical response or remission, the probability of achieving functional remission was greater (43.38% and 54.15%, respectively), although many still did not achieve this status. Conclusions: For patients with TRD, esketamine NS had a significant functional benefit versus RWT after 6 months of treatment. Irrespective of treatment, achievement of clinical response or remission was insufficient to attain functional remission. Nevertheless, clinical remission increased the likelihood of achieving functional remission, further supporting an important role for clinical remission in for the path towards functional recovery.

Indexed as

esketamine nasal sprayfunctional remissionfunctioningindirect treatment comparisonpatient-reported outcomeSheehan Disability Scaletreatment resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID39435126
PMCPMC11491562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.