Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435124›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Subjective experiences of an acceptance and mindfulness-based group intervention (Feel-Good-Group) in young people with early psychosis.

Laura von Hardenberg, Karolina Leopold, Andrea Pfennig, Céline Kuhn, Michèle Kallenbach, Navid Aliakbari, Stephanie Mehl, Andreas Bechdolf

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04592042 (Intervention to Improve Coping With Negative Emotions in Patients With Psychotic Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04592042 early_phase1completednot on this map

Intervention to Improve Coping With Negative Emotions in Patients With Psychotic Disorders: Feasibility and Efficacy of an Emotion-oriented Cognitive-behavioural Group Intervention ("Feel-Good-Group").

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsEarly Psychosis, Delusions, Emotional Distress, Self EsteemArmsFeel-Good- Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura von HardenbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine incorporating FRITZ and soulspace, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Karolina LeopoldDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine incorporating FRITZ and soulspace, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea PfennigDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Céline KuhnDepartment of Health and Social Work, University of Applied Sciences Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michèle KallenbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine incorporating FRITZ and soulspace, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Navid AliakbariDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine incorporating FRITZ and soulspace, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Stephanie MehlDepartment of Health and Social Work, University of Applied Sciences Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas BechdolfDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine incorporating FRITZ and soulspace, Vivantes Hospital am Urban and Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness-based interventions are promising psychological treatment approaches that may have more substantial long-lasting intervention effects than cognitive behavioral therapy when treating individuals with early psychosis. A pilot study analyzed mindfulness-based inpatient group therapy's feasibility and potential efficacy (Feel-Good). Objective: This paper explores the subjective experiences of participants in the Feel-Good inpatient therapy group to gain insight into the possible changes brought about by the mindfulness-based intervention. Methods: A semi-structured change interview was used to examine the experience of ten participants who participated in the Feel-Good intervention and the additional qualitative assessment. The interviews were conducted 16 weeks after the Feel-Good group ended (16-week Follow-Up). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: The analysis generated five themes-one about personal changes brought about by the Feel-Good group, three about the group therapy experience, and one about wishes/modification suggestions to change and improve the Feel-Good group. The findings suggested that the Feel-Good group was perceived as very helpful, leading to numerous changes in one's overall well-being and relation to emotions. However, patients recommended a more directive therapeutic style and reduced time required for study assessments. Conclusion: Gathering qualitative insight from participants on the Feel-Good intervention revealed meaningful insight into patients' experience of change processes. In addition, participant suggestions help to improve the intervention and study design to increase therapy attendance rates and treatment satisfaction, potentially increasing treatment effectiveness in the future. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04592042.

Indexed as

early interventionearly psychosisemotion regulationgroup therapyinpatient treatmentmindfulness-based therapy

Identifiers

PMID39435124
PMCPMC11492832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.