ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Exploring challenges to the uptake of sexual and reproductive health services among lesbian and bisexual women in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: a qualitative enquiry.
Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in Africa.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reproductive healthcare is essential for all people, including lesbian and bisexual women. However, lesbians and bisexual women are among society's most marginalised and excluded members. Objective: This study aimed to explore the challenges faced by lesbian and bisexual women in accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) Services in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Design: An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study was conducted on two populations that included eight participants identified through the Voice of the Voiceless organisation in Bulawayo and 10 key informants and probed the challenges faced by lesbians and bisexual women when accessing SRH services. Methods: Data were gathered through 10 key informant interviews and 1 focus group discussion (FGD; with 8 participants). The interviews and FGDs were recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and thematically analysed. Results: The themes that emerged included the uptake of SRH services among lesbians and bisexual women, the challenges faced by lesbians and bisexual women when accessing SRH services, and strategies to aid the uptake of SRH services by lesbians and bisexual women. The findings showed that the uptake of SRH services was generally low and was influenced by factors such as clinical settings. The challenges mentioned included stigma and the unavailability of specific lesbian and bisexual women's services. By contrast, the most frequent strategies included affirmative training for healthcare providers and improved clinical settings to become friendly and inclusive. Conclusion: There is an imperative for targeted SRH services that address the distinct needs of lesbians and bisexual women, in line with the 95-95-95 strategy and Sustainable Development Goals target 3.7. The observed low uptake of these services can be attributed to several systemic barriers, including inadequate training of health providers, negative attitudes and lack of inclusive policies. Enhancing the sensitivity of health facilities, strengthening links to sexual health education and implementing supportive legal frameworks are essential steps to improve SRH outcomes in this population. These findings elucidate critical gaps within the current healthcare system and present significant opportunities for policymakers to formulate evidence-based strategies to ensure equitable access to SRH services, thereby advancing public health objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.