Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39435122›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health

Exploring challenges to the uptake of sexual and reproductive health services among lesbian and bisexual women in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: a qualitative enquiry.

Methembe Yotamu Khozah, Wilfred Njabulo Nunu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Methembe Yotamu KhozahDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Environmental Science, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Wilfred Njabulo NunuDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Environmental Science, National University of Science and Technology, Corner Cecil Avenue and Gwanda Road, P.O Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8421-1478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reproductive healthcare is essential for all people, including lesbian and bisexual women. However, lesbians and bisexual women are among society's most marginalised and excluded members. Objective: This study aimed to explore the challenges faced by lesbian and bisexual women in accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) Services in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Design: An exploratory, descriptive qualitative study was conducted on two populations that included eight participants identified through the Voice of the Voiceless organisation in Bulawayo and 10 key informants and probed the challenges faced by lesbians and bisexual women when accessing SRH services. Methods: Data were gathered through 10 key informant interviews and 1 focus group discussion (FGD; with 8 participants). The interviews and FGDs were recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and thematically analysed. Results: The themes that emerged included the uptake of SRH services among lesbians and bisexual women, the challenges faced by lesbians and bisexual women when accessing SRH services, and strategies to aid the uptake of SRH services by lesbians and bisexual women. The findings showed that the uptake of SRH services was generally low and was influenced by factors such as clinical settings. The challenges mentioned included stigma and the unavailability of specific lesbian and bisexual women's services. By contrast, the most frequent strategies included affirmative training for healthcare providers and improved clinical settings to become friendly and inclusive. Conclusion: There is an imperative for targeted SRH services that address the distinct needs of lesbians and bisexual women, in line with the 95-95-95 strategy and Sustainable Development Goals target 3.7. The observed low uptake of these services can be attributed to several systemic barriers, including inadequate training of health providers, negative attitudes and lack of inclusive policies. Enhancing the sensitivity of health facilities, strengthening links to sexual health education and implementing supportive legal frameworks are essential steps to improve SRH outcomes in this population. These findings elucidate critical gaps within the current healthcare system and present significant opportunities for policymakers to formulate evidence-based strategies to ensure equitable access to SRH services, thereby advancing public health objectives.

Indexed as

Bulawayogender and sexual minoritieslesbian and bisexual womensexual and reproductive health servicessexual reproductive health services uptakeZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID39435122
PMCPMC11492191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.