ArticleHeliyon2024
Positive Lymph Node Ratio as a new prognostic score in Geriatric patients with operated gastric cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Metastatic Lymph Node Count and Primary Tumor Size with Disease-Free Survival in Stage II-III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of the Borrmann classification in stage 2-3 gastric cancer.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- A prognostic nomogram utilized lymph node ratio for signet ring cell gastric cancer patients post-surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The pivotal prognostic determinant for recurrence and survival in surgically treated gastric cancer (GC) patients remains the lymph node status. Despite the adoption of D2 lymph node dissection as the standard approach in recent years, its association with increased morbidity in elderly patients raises concerns. This study aims to explore the prognostic significance of the Positive Lymph Node Ratio (PLNR) score in the context of recurrence and survival among elderly patients with surgically treated GC. Material and method: A retrospective review of files about surgically treated patients with GC was conducted. The prognostic impact of the PLNR score on overall survival (OS) was assessed through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The cut-off value for the PLNR, determined through ROC analysis, was identified as 0.138. This value serves as a crucial threshold, as it distinguishes patients with a higher risk of poor outcomes. Patients with a PLNR score of 0.138 or below exhibited a median OS of 111 months, whereas those with a PLNR score above 0.138 had a significantly lower median OS of 22 months (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Our findings revealed that the PLNR emerged as an independent predictor of survival and recurrence in patients undergoing GC resection.However, it's important to note that while valuable, the PLNR system has limitations. It does not encompass the T stage, a key factor in cancer staging. Therefore, it cannot be a direct substitute for the comprehensive information TNM staging provides. It should be used as a supplementary tool in predicting prognosis, particularly in elderly patients unsuitable for standard lymph node dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.