ArticleClinical epidemiology2024
Harmonized Data Quality Indicators Maintain Data Quality in Long-Term Safety Studies Using Multiple Sclerosis Registries/Data Sources: Experience from the CLARION Study.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Oral Cladribine on TSPO-PET-Measurable Immune Cell Activation in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Evaluating Data Quality by Proxy: Can We Evaluate All Dimensions of the European Medicines Agency Data Quality Framework for Registry-Based Post-Authorization Safety Studies?Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Insights into adherence to cladribine tablets in the real world in multiple countries: results from patient support programs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Cladribine tablets as therapy for advanced relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 4-year follow-up real-world, multi-center, retrospective, cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Understanding the long-term safety of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) in routine clinical practice can be undertaken through registry-based studies. However, variability of data quality across such sources poses the challenge of data fit for regulatory decision-making. CLARION, a non-interventional cohort safety study of cladribine tablets, combines aggregated data from MS registries/data sources, except in Germany (which utilizes primary data collection). We describe the application of key data quality indicators (DQIs) within CLARION to evaluate data quality over time, as recommended by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on registry-based studies. Methods: DQIs were defined with participating registries/sources; they were used to assess data quality according to the EMA Data Quality Framework, addressing consistency, accuracy, completeness, and study representativeness. DQIs were associated with potential remedial measures if data quality was not met. DQIs were summarized overall and for individual MS registries/data sources to November 1, 2022. Results: A total of 28 DQIs were analyzed using data from 5069 patients arising from eight MS registries/data sources and 14 countries. The Representativeness DQIs showed that 72.0% of patients were female, median age at MS diagnosis was 29.0 to 43.3 years, and 93.5% had relapsing-remitting MS. Consistency DQIs showed a total of 2899 patients had achieved at least two years of follow-up; 6.9% did not have any recorded visits during this timeframe. Discrepant values were assessed as part of Accuracy DQIs, and improvements over time were noted for recorded dates of MS onset and diagnosis. Regarding Completeness DQIs, 191/5069 (3.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: The application of 28 DQIs within the CLARION study has helped with understanding, not only intrinsic and question-specific determinants of data quality, but also tracking the quality of post-authorization safety data obtained from MS registries/data sources, thereby providing a foundation for the regulatory decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.