Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434970›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2024

Small incisions still require great anesthesia: anesthesiology techniques to enhance recovery in robotic coronary bypass grafting.

Danny Feike Hoogma, Wouter Oosterlinck, Steffen Rex

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danny Feike HoogmaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wouter OosterlinckDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steffen RexDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of coronary artery disease. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the anesthetic management for robotic CABG. Challenges associated with robotic CABG are discussed and various anesthetic techniques, perioperative elements and pain management modalities that can contribute to enhanced patient recovery are explored.

Indexed as

enhanced recoverypain managementpatient satisfactionquality of recovery (QoR)Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (robotic CABG)

Identifiers

PMID39434970
PMCPMC11491184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.