Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434952›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024

Family History of Stuttering among Kurdish Children Who Stutter Near the Age of Onset.

Hiwa Mohammadi, Parya Bakhtiary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Family History of Developmental Stuttering: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hiwa MohammadiNeuroscience Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Parya BakhtiaryNeuroscience Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The family history of stuttering is one of the most important factors for the prediction of recovery from stuttering. There is a high controversy about the rate of positive family history of stuttering among people who stutter (PWS). In the present study, the family history of stuttering in the first-, second-, and third-degree relatives was investigated among a group of Kurdish children who stuttered (CWS) close to the onset of the disorder. Materials and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two CWS, including 46 females (24.60%) aged 2-5 years (mean age: 3.71 years, SD = 0.75) were consecutively recruited. They were first examined close to the onset of the stuttering. Data about current and former stuttering among first-, second-, and third-degree relatives were collected using interviews with both parents. Data was described and analyzed by independent sample Results: Among 172 CWS (mean age: 3.71 years, SD = 0.75), 119 (69.20%) reported a family history of stuttering. According to the result, the most family history of stuttering was reported among third-degree relatives (32.60%). Sixty-five participants (37.80%) reported just one relative with stuttering. CWS with a positive family history of stuttering had no significant difference with CWS without a positive family history of stuttering in sex ( Conclusion: The rate of positive family history of stuttering among Kurdish CWS is similar to previously reported data in the same age group. There was no significant association of family history of stuttering with sex and age on the onset of the disorder.

Indexed as

Childhood-onset fluency disorderfamily medical historyhereditystuttering

Identifiers

PMID39434952
PMCPMC11493213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.