ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2024
A New Index for Assessment of Severity and Extent of Gingival Pigmentation; A Diagnostic Cross-Sectional Study According to Inter and Intra-Observer Variability.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of microneedling technique and diode laser in gingival depigmentation: A prospective randomized study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison of knowledge and esthetic perception regarding gingival pigmentation between students from different non-dentistry health profession programs.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Classification of gingival pigmentation (GP) is often performed using gingival pigmentation index (GPI), melanin pigmentation index (MPI), oral pigmentation index (DOPI), melanin index (MI), or physiologic/pathologic GPI. However, the internal and external reproducibility of these indexes have not been evaluated. This study aimed to introduce a new simple and applicable GPI and assess its internal and external reproducibility. Materials and Methods: This diagnostic cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 patients with maxillary and mandibular GP. Patients were in the age range of 12-60 years, and degree of GP was determined by four periodontists using DOPI, MI, MPI, GPI and the new index namely the severity and extension of gingival melanotic pigmentation index (SEMPI) under similar environmental and lighting conditions. The inclusion criteria were in the age range of 12-60 years and presence of melanin pigmentation (physiologic or pathologic) in the gingival margin, papilla, or attached gingiva. The exclusion criteria were systemic diseases, vascular lesions, hemochromatosis, amalgam tattoo, hyperbilirubinemia, or use of medications causing nonmelanotic pigmentation (hemoglobin, iron, and amalgam). Results: The Fleiss kappa between all examiners for all indexes at 0, 7, and 14 days was higher than 0.8, indicating high agreement among the examiners. The Spearman's correlation coefficient for all indexes was positive and high at 0, 7, and 14 days ( Conclusion: Considering the high agreement among the examiners for all indexes and at all-time points as well as the positive, strong correlations among them, it seems that the new index is useful for classification of GP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.