ArticleCureus2024
Survival Without Neurological Sequelae Following Massive Pulmonary Embolism and Prolonged Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the case of a 17-year-old female who survived cardiac arrest caused by a massive pulmonary embolism leading to obstructive shock. Despite a prolonged low-flow period of 193 minutes, she fully recovered without apparent neurological damage, thanks to immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated by her father, timely intervention by paramedics and medical teams, and the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Key factors in her recovery included the absence of a no-flow period, maintenance of end-tidal CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.