ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Development of a prognostic model related to homologous recombination deficiency in glioma based on multiple machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated bulk and single-cell transcriptomic analyses identify transcriptome-defined groups and EGFR-associated microenvironmental programs in glioma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a robust cuproptosis related signature for primary glioma via machine learning aided by loop training and validation.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The Prognostic Value of a Nomogram Model Based on Tumor Immune Markers and Clinical Factors for Adult Primary Glioma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Precision synergy: IDH and PARP inhibitors as a dual-target strategy in IDH-mutant glioma treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based integration develops a hypoxia-derived signature for improving outcomes in glioma.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in neuro-oncology, treatments of glioma and tools for predicting the outcome of patients remain limited. The objective of this research is to construct a prognostic model for glioma using the Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) score and validate its predictive capability for glioma. Methods: We consolidated glioma datasets from TCGA, various cancer types for pan-cancer HRD analysis, and two additional glioma RNAseq datasets from GEO and CGGA databases. HRD scores, mutation data, and other genomic indices were calculated. Using machine learning algorithms, we identified signature genes and constructed an HRD-related prognostic risk model. The model's performance was validated across multiple cohorts. We also assessed immune infiltration and conducted molecular docking to identify potential therapeutic agents. Results: Our analysis established a correlation between higher HRD scores and genomic instability in gliomas. The model, based on machine learning algorithms, identified seven key genes, significantly predicting patient prognosis. Moreover, the HRD score prognostic model surpassed other models in terms of prediction efficacy across different cancers. Differential immune cell infiltration patterns were observed between HRD risk groups, with potential implications for immunotherapy. Molecular docking highlighted several compounds, notably Panobinostat, as promising for high-risk patients. Conclusions: The prognostic model based on the HRD score threshold and associated genes in glioma offers new insights into the genomic and immunological landscapes, potentially guiding therapeutic strategies. The differential immune profiles associated with HRD-risk groups could inform immunotherapeutic interventions, with our findings paving the way for personalized medicine in glioma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.