ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2024
Intraoperative changes in electrophysiological monitoring can be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cavernous malformation.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reporting practices of baseline and surgical variables in spinal cavernous malformation surgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Intramedullary Spinal Cord Cavernous Angiomas in Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations.Genes · 2026Review
- Spinal Cavernous Malformations: A Narrative Review.NeuroSci · 2026Review
- Recent novelties in research and management of cerebrospinal cavernous malformations.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of these monitoring parameters in predicting postoperative neurological dysfunction. Methods: In this study, a total of 85 patients with spinal cavernous malformations (SCMs) treated at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, from November 2012 to August 2017 were included. During the surgical procedures, all patients underwent monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). The criteria for warning included a reduction of ≥80% in MEP amplitude and ≥50% in SEP amplitude. Results: Among 85 patients, 40 (47.1%) had SCMs located in the thoracic segment, 35 (41.2%) in the cervical segment, 6 (7.1%) in the cervical thoracic segment, and 4 (4.7%) in the lumbar segment. MEP recordings were obtained from 81 patients, and the preoperative McCormick score was 1.53 ± 0.69. The sensitivity of multimodal monitoring combined with the criteria of 80% reduction in MEP amplitude and SEP was 83.9%, with a specificity of 69%, a positive predictive value of 69%, and a negative predictive value of 90.4%. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the crucial role of electrophysiological monitoring, particularly MEP and SEP, during the surgical resection of SCMs. The findings demonstrate that this approach is effective in predicting and preventing postoperative neurological dysfunction, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.