Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrices: Preliminary Results.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Peri-areolar dermal reinforcement to prevent prosthetic-related complications in prepectoral reconstruction with a compromised nipple-areola complex: a surgical technique.Gland surgery · 2026
   Article
2. Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Insights From Recent Oncologic and Plastic Surgery Guidelines.Cureus · 2026
   Review
3. Postoperative Infection After Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Risk Factors and Clinical Burden in a Large Single-Center Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
   Article
4. Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction-Do We Need It?Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as