Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434779›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Predicting 24-hour intraocular pressure peaks and averages with machine learning.

Ranran Chen, Jinming Lei, Yujie Liao, Yiping Jin, Xue Wang, Xiaomei Li, Danping Wu, Hong Li, Yanlong Bi, Haohao Zhu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ranran ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinming LeiSoftware Engineering, Shenzhen Yishi Huolala Technology Company Limited, Shenzhen, China.
Yujie LiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiping JinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Danping WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanlong BiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tongji Eye Institute, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Haohao ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Predicting 24-hour peak and average intraocular pressure (IOP) is essential for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. This study aimed to develop and assess a machine learning model for predicting 24-hour peak and average IOP, leveraging advanced techniques to enhance prediction accuracy. We also aimed to identify relevant features and provide insights into the prediction results to better inform clinical practice. Methods: In this retrospective study, electronic medical records from January 2014 to May 2024 were analyzed, incorporating 24-hour IOP monitoring data and patient characteristics. Predictive models based on five machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated. Five time points (10:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 2:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 6:00 PM) were tested to optimize prediction accuracy using their combinations. The model with the highest performance was selected, and feature importance was assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations. Results: This study included data from 517 patients (1,034 eyes). For predicting 24-hour peak IOP, the Random Forest Regression (RFR) model utilizing IOP values at 10:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 2:00 PM, and 4:00 PM achieved optimal performance: MSE 5.248, RMSE 2.291, MAE 1.694, and R Conclusion: The study developed machine learning models that predict 24-hour peak and average IOP. Specific time point combinations and the RFR algorithm were identified, which improved the accuracy of predicting 24-hour peak and average intraocular pressure. These findings provide the potential for more effective management and treatment strategies for glaucoma patients.

Indexed as

24-hourglaucomaintraocular pressuremachine learningmeasurementnocturnal

Identifiers

PMID39434779
PMCPMC11493148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.