ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
High-frequency irreversible electroporation ablation for the prostate in Beagle dogs.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Compound steep-pulse irreversible electroporation for prostate ablation in Beagle dogs: parameter evaluation and short-term safety.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Pulsed field ablation in medicine: irreversible electroporation and electropermeabilization theory and applications.Radiology and oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ablation procedures have garnered significant attention as a minimally invasive treatment of prostate diseases. However, the feasibility and safety of applying high-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) to ablate the Beagle prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment have not been thoroughly explored, the appropriate range of parameters has not been determined. In order to ensure the feasibility and safety of prostate ablation surgery, we conducted a study using Beagle dogs as subjects to investigate prostate tissue. Methods: We utilized a composite steep pulse therapy device to perform ablations on 26 lateral lobes of the prostate in 13 Beagles, employing various parameters for different needle distances. The effectiveness of this device was assessed through the observation of the ablation area, intraoperative muscle tremors, postoperative hematological examination, and gross inspection. Results: The findings of our study revealed that 1,000 to 2,000 v/cm in electric field strength, combined with 5 µs pulse width and pulse number 100, is a safe parameter range for ablation of prostate tissue. At the same time, the large electric field strength (2,000 v/cm) has the best ablation effect with the biggest continuous and thorough ablation area. All parameters of H-FIRE were safe for Beagles. Conclusions: H-FIRE ablation for prostate is safe and effective in dogs, which has the potential to be a useful addition to the range of minimally invasive treatments available for the treatment of BPH against this backdrop of increasing surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.