ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2024
A narrative review of sperm selection technology for assisted reproduction techniques.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An automatic semen processing system versus a manual method for semen processing: a randomized, single-blind non-inferiority trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Trial
- Nanoparticle-Based Approaches for Enhancing In Vitro Fertilization in Animal Reproduction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of ICSI Using Advanced Quantitative Phase Microscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Endocrine-metabolic modulators in sperm biotechnology: cross-species mechanisms and translational priorities.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Rabbit serum albumin as a novel biochemical modulator for enhancing female offspring production in commercial pig breeding through artificial insemination.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Ray of Hope for Infertility.ACS omega · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: In-vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become increasingly prevalent even in cases without significant male factor infertility; however, stagnant live-birth rates, both nationally and internationally, have driven more research into sperm selection. To date, nothing has replaced swim-up and density-gradient preparation methods and therefore we sought to review the state of the science. Methods: A PubMed search was performed between years of 1989 and 2024 for English research articles reporting data on sperm selection technology in assisted reproductive technology. Key Content and Findings: IVF with ICSI is increasingly prevalent even in men with normal semen parameters. Despite technologic advances and widespread use, reproductive outcomes with ICSI have been stagnant. This market for opportunity growth has allowed for sperm selection techniques to grow exponentially with heterogeneity in utilization and a paucity of positive reproductive outcomes. Swim-up and density-gradient centrifugation remain the most utilized sperm selection techniques. Various future technologies show promise including epigenetics, sperm biomarkers and a potential role of artificial intelligence; however, more research is needed. Conclusions: Given unchanged IVF success rates, sperm selection technologies hold promise to improve reproductive outcomes beyond traditional ICSI. At present, no technique has shown superiority to swim up and density centrifugation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.