ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
Association between time to treatment and bladder cancer survival: a population-based analysis.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Delayed treatment initiation is associated with worse survival in screening-detected patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer in rural China: a 10-year cohort study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in bladder cancer diagnosis, treatment, and specialty care access amongFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of Surgical Wait Time on Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer treatment delay is a global health system issue. However, data concerning the impact of treatment delays on survival in bladder cancer remain controversial. This study sought to evaluate the impact of time from diagnosis to treatment on survival outcomes of bladder cancer patients in the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: The SEER was searched from 2000 to 2020 for bladder cancer patients. Logistical regression was used to explore potential factors related to treatment delay. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to investigate the overall and cancer-specific survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the effects of covariables on survival outcomes in bladder cancer with treatment delay. Results: There were 12,686 eligible patients included in this study. A total of 2,379 patients experienced an initial treatment delay. Initial treatment delay was related to worse survival. Sex, age, pathological grade, clinical stage, and surgery were associated with increased odds of initial treatment delay. In the patients with initial treatment delay, age, advanced stage, lymph node involvement, high pathological grades and metastasis were independent predictors of poor overall survival and cancer-specific survival, while marital status at diagnosis, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were found to improve both overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Significant disparities in pathological/clinical variables could contribute to treatment delay. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy benefited the survival of patients with treatment delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.