Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434739›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024

Retrospective observation of the early efficacy and safety of temperature-sensitive liquid embolic agent combined with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Fangfang Lin, Qian Chen, Meizhu Gao, Yuanyuan Ji, Dandan Ruan, Jianhui Zhang, Yanfeng Zhou, Shaojie Wu, Senlin Cai, Jiewei Luo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fangfang Lin *Department of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qian Chen *Department of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Meizhu Gao *Department of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuanyuan Ji *Department of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Dandan RuanDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jianhui ZhangDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yanfeng ZhouDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shaojie WuDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Senlin CaiDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jiewei LuoDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhuting FangDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yi TangDepartment of Radiology and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has gradually become a hot topic in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the best embolization material for PAE. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the temperature-sensitive liquid embolic agent (TempSLE) combined with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) microspheres and simple PVA microspheres for PAE in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by BPH. Methods: The clinical data of 39 patients with LUTS caused by BPH were included in this study, including 21 cases of PVA microspheres group and 18 cases of PVA microspheres + TempSLE group. The changes in various subjective and objective indexes were compared between the two groups before PAE, 1 and 3 months after operation. Results: Three months after operation, the improvement in prostate volume (PV), post-void residual volume (PVR), peak urinary flow rate (Q Conclusions: The combination of PVA microspheres and TempSLE for PAE appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of symptomatic BPH patients, with a higher degree of damage to hyperplastic prostate tissue compared to simple PVA microspheres embolization.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)clinical efficacylower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)prostatic artery embolization (PAE)temperature-sensitive liquid embolic agent (TempSLE)

Identifiers

PMID39434739
PMCPMC11491212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.