ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2024
The diagnostic value of two-dimensional ultrasound score, contrast-enhanced ultrasound score and ultrasound elastography score in prostate cancer.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in new ultrasound technologies in targeted prostate biopsy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy in men, with early diagnosis being crucial for treatment and prognosis. This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of two-dimensional ultrasound imaging score (2DUS), contrast-enhanced ultrasound score (CEUS), and ultrasound elastography score (UES) in PCa. Methods: The PCa group consisted of patients diagnosed with primary PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy at the second hospital of Shanxi Medical University between January 2022 and December 2023. The benign lesion group consisted of patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)through prostate biopsy during the same period. We compared ultrasound scores at PCa and BPH patients using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The study collected comprehensive patient data and analyzed variations in 2DUS, CEUS, and UES to identify relationships between preoperative ultrasound findings and the pathological states of PCa patients. Results: PCa patients exhibited significantly higher ultrasound scores (P<0.001). Optimal cut-offs were 2.110 for 2DUS, 3.235 for CEUS, and 2.790 for UES, yielding area under curves (AUC) of 0.789, 0.817, and 0.898. The combined score provided an AUC of 0.933, with 83.33% sensitivity and 90.70% specificity. In the form of that patients with tumor stage III-IV, pathological grade III, poor differentiation, and pelvic lymph node metastasis exhibited significantly higher scores in 2DUS, CEUS, and UES compared to those with tumor stages I-II, pathological grades I-II, moderate and high differentiation without pelvic lymph node metastasis, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions: The combined use of 2DUS, CEUS, and UES scores is highly effective for early PCa detection, surpassing individual scores in accuracy, and is beneficial for staging and differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.