Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434628›Full record

ArticleArchives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research

Examining Highly Novel Positive Future Thinking in Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Adolescents.

Rachel J Nam, Christine B Cha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel J Nam
Christine B Cha

Funding

Prospection in suicidal teens: Identifying a novel and malleable cognitive risk factorR15MH113076 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE · PI GABA, AYORKOR · 2018 to 2023
$870k
Positive future thinking among suicidal adolescentsR21MH133132 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE · PI CHA, CHRISTINE B. · 2023 to 2024
$409k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113076NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH133132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough traditionally considered protective, certain forms of positive future thinking (PFT) may be associated with greater suicide risk. In this first a priori investigation of potential maladaptive forms of PFT, we tested whether novelty (i.e., dissimilarity to past experiences) and lack of attainment of the imagined positive future may explain counterintuitive associations between PFT and suicidal ideation (SI).

methodAt baseline, adolescents (

resultsPFT, only when highly novel, was associated with stronger recent SI severity at baseline, above and beyond depressive symptoms. It also significantly predicted recent SI severity 3 and 6 months later, although not after we controlled for baseline SI severity. Novelty of the imagined positive future was not related to whether the event happened. However, when those events did happen, adolescents who imagined more novel events tended to experience them less positively than imagined, which separately predicted stronger recent SI severity at the 6-month follow-up.

conclusionsResults support that PFT is a heterogeneous construct that is not uniformly beneficial. Better understanding potential pitfalls of PFT may help us discern how to best incorporate PFT into clinical interventions.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationThinkingAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildDepressionFemaleHumansImaginationMaleSuicide, AttemptedYoung AdultAttainmentnoveltypositive future thinkingsuicideyouth

Identifiers

PMID39434628
PMCPMC11496765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.