Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434515›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2025

"Showing up to the conversation": Qualitative reflections from a diversity, equity, and inclusion book club with emergency medicine leadership.

Andreia B Alexander, Megan Palmer, Dajanae Palmer, Katie Pettit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Depathologising University.Scandinavian journal of disability research : SJDR · 2025
    Article
  2. "Showing up to the conversation": Qualitative reflections from a diversity, equity, and inclusion book club with emergency medicine leadership.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreia B AlexanderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8483-1124
Megan PalmerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Dajanae PalmerDepartment of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Katie PettitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5735-9837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in health care fosters many positive outcomes including improved patient care. DEI initiatives are often created by or require buy-in from departmental leaders with low DEI literacy. Book clubs are one way to develop DEI literacy. The purpose of this paper is to describe how leaders in the department of emergency medicine (DEM) process the information gained from reading a DEI book through discussion in a book club setting and explore how participation enhances their DEI literacy and fosters self-reflection.

methodsThis was a qualitative exploratory study based on a constructivist approach. Data were analyzed by four researchers using inductive thematic analysis techniques.

resultsSixty-eight leaders within the DEM participated in 11 book clubs. Nine themes were identified (examination of privilege, initial reaction to discussion about racism, discomfort, worry, self-reflection, release, role recognition, readiness, and education). After prompted examination of their own privilege participants moved through a model of perceived readiness to act. Participants started with feeling paralyzed by the work's enormity or becoming defensive. They then moved toward discomfort with discussions of racism and systemic racism and progressed to discussions around worrying that they were contributing to noninclusive environments. After a period of self-reflection, participants tended to release their paralysis, push aside their defensiveness, accept the role of discomfort, and express the importance of education on these issues. Participants then recognized their role in creating inclusive environments and started discussing what they can do about it, which, for many, was to show up to the conversation. An underlying driver of movement through this model was the education that was provided through the book.

conclusionsBy addressing privilege and systemic inequities through the reflective practice and dialogue of a book club, participants demonstrated a growing commitment and perceived readiness to advancing inclusive practices within medicine.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEmergency MedicineLeadershipAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39434515
PMCPMC11816006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.