Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434444›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025

Enhancing amide proton transfer imaging in ischemic stroke using a machine learning approach with partially synthetic data.

Malvika Viswanathan, Leqi Yin, Yashwant Kurmi, Aqeela Afzal, Zhongliang Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malvika ViswanathanVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9522-0780
Leqi YinVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yashwant KurmiVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Aqeela AfzalDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Zhongliang ZuVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-7480

Funding

Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) MR imaging of choline phospholipids and their metabolismR01EB029443 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Optimizing Glutamate Imaging using CEST MRI at 3T Clinical ScannersR03EB029078 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZU, ZHONGLIANG · 2020 to 2021
$170k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029443NIH HHS R01 EB029443NIH HHS R03 EB029078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging, a technique sensitive to tissue pH, holds promise in the diagnosis of ischemic stroke. Achieving accurate and rapid APT imaging is crucial for this application. However, conventional APT quantification methods either lack accuracy or are time-consuming. Machine learning (ML) has recently been recognized as a potential solution to improve APT quantification. In this paper, we applied an ML model trained on a new type of partially synthetic data, along with an optimization approach utilizing recursive feature elimination, to predict APT imaging in an animal stroke model. This partially synthetic datum is not a simple blend of measured and simulated chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals. Rather, it integrates the underlying components including all CEST, direct water saturation, and magnetization transfer effects partly derived from measurements and simulations to reconstruct the CEST signals using an inverse summation relationship. Training with partially synthetic data requires less in vivo data compared to training entirely with fully synthetic or in vivo data, making it a more practical approach. Since this type of data closely resembles real tissue, it leads to more accurate predictions than ML models trained on fully synthetic data. Results indicate that an ML model trained on this partially synthetic data can successfully predict the APT effect with enhanced accuracy, providing significant contrast between stroke lesions and normal tissues, thus clearly delineating lesions. In contrast, conventional quantification methods such as the asymmetric analysis method, three-point method, and multiple-pool model Lorentzian fit showed inadequate accuracy in quantifying the APT effect. Moreover, ML methods trained using in vivo data and fully synthetic data exhibited poor predictive performance due to insufficient training data and inaccurate simulation pool settings or parameter ranges, respectively. Following optimization, only 13 frequency offsets were selected from the initial 69, resulting in significantly reduced scan time.

Indexed as

AmidesIschemic StrokeMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingProtonsAnimalsMaleAmidesProtonsamide proton transfer (APT)chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)machine learningpH imagingstroke

Identifiers

PMID39434444
PMCPMC11602689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.