ArticleThe world journal of men's health2025
Evaluating Sperm Recovery Time and Efficacy of Monotherapy
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Testicular Biopsies in Adolescent and Adult Andrological Patients: The EAA Clinical Guidelines.Andrology · 2026Guideline
- Efficacy of Gonadotropin Therapy to Induce Spermatogenesis and Fertility in Men with Pathologic Gonadotropin Deficiency.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is a lack of pooled data exploring the time and rates for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) monotherapy MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to November 2023. Forrest plots were generated to visually present the pooled effect sizes for time to recover spermatogenesis, specifically employing the standardized mean difference (SMD). Publication bias was assessed utilizing funnel plots. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023473615.
resultsThe search identified 720 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis of 1,240 men with CHH revealed significant differences in the time to recover spermatogenesis between combination therapies and monotherapy. The weighted mean recovery time was significantly shorter for combination therapies (10 months) compared to monotherapy (33 months). The SMD under the common effect model was 8.8 for combination therapies and 24.98 for monotherapy, indicating a more rapid recovery with combination therapies, p<0.01. The rates of sperm recovery were 66.76% for combination therapies and 51.9% for monotherapy, p=0.03. Significant heterogeneity was observed in both groups (I²=86% for combination therapies and I²=68% for monotherapy), suggesting considerable variation in individual responses.
conclusionsThe present meta-analysis reveals that in men with CHH, combination therapies expedite spermatogenesis recovery more than monotherapy. Additionally, combination therapies yield a higher rate of sperm appearing in the ejaculate as compared to hCG monotherapy. The significant heterogeneity observed in both groups underscores the variability in individual responses, warranting further investigation and caution in interpreting these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.