ReviewThe world journal of men's health2025
Individual and Socioeconomic Affecting Factors for Prostate Cancer Screening Behavior.
Review in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-urban disparities in prostate-specific antigen testing and shared decision-making in the US.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Impact of protocolized intravesical instillation after TURBT on men's sexual quality of life:a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Trends in stage-specific prostate cancer incidence by neighborhood socioeconomic status.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been much controversy about the effectiveness of prostate cancer (PC) screening in the treatment of PC. Recently, with the increase in advanced and metastatic PCs, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is again emphasized. However, no systematic study has examined the factors influencing PSA screening behavior. This study highlights the importance of socioeconomic factors, such as income, education, marital status, insurance status, and medical accessibility, in PC screening behavior. We conducted a search for articles related to PSA screening through Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed, and we chose 40 articles. And we divided factors associated with PSA screening into two groups, such as individual characteristic factors and socioeconomic factor. In addition to identifying individual factors that could affect both medical providers and patients, this review will also highlight the importance of socioeconomic factors including income, education, marital status, insurance status, and medical accessibility affecting PC screening behavior. Future guidelines should integrate these socioeconomic factors, particularly for patients with unfavorable socioeconomic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.