Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434365›Full record

ReviewKorean circulation journal2024

Demystifying the Quandary of Ostial Stenting.

Debabrata Dash, Rohit Mody, Umanshi Dash, Yashas Prasad Mylarappa, Bhavya Mody

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean circulation journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical and procedural outcomes of ostial left anterior descending artery intervention with or without crossover to left-main.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Excessive Ostial Stent Protrusion: Evaluation of Management Strategies and Clinical Outcomes of the Side Flap Technique.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  3. Advancing Solutions for Coronary Ostial Lesions.Korean circulation journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Debabrata DashDepartment of Cardiology, Aster Hospital, Dubai, UAE. dr_dash2003@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1354-3808
Rohit ModyDepartment of Cardiology, Mody Harvard Institute & Research Centre, Krishna Super Speciality Hospital, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-5803
Umanshi DashDepartment of Cardiology, Mody Harvard Institute & Research Centre, Krishna Super Speciality Hospital, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7950-4896
Yashas Prasad MylarappaDepartment of Medicine, Shimoga Institute of Medical Science, Shimoga, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-6540
Bhavya ModyDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-9418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate stent placement is known to be hampered by the anatomical nature of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ostial lesions, such as aorta-ostial lesions and Medina 001 bifurcation lesions. The Ostial Pro device, the aorta floating wire technique, the stent pull-back technique, the Szabo (tail-wire) techniques, the marker wire technique, the T-stent and small protrusion technique, the cross-over 1-stent technique, and new dedicated ostial stents are some of the techniques used to achieve perfection in precise ostial stent placement. The current state of knowledge about ostial PCI and novel approaches for optimizing these procedures are compiled in this review.

Indexed as

Coronary angiographyPercutaneous coronary interventionStent

Identifiers

PMID39434365
PMCPMC11569937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.