Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434254›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2024

Engaging under-represented oldest old in research: An approach for inclusive recruitment.

Naomi Paine, Melanie Lowe, Charlotte Young, Gavin Turrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naomi PaineAustralian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5706-5356
Melanie LoweRMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-1895
Charlotte YoungThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-7616
Gavin TurrellRMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-8744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThose aged 80 years and over are the fastest-growing sector of the Australian population but are often excluded from research. Oldest old people living alone, in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, and with ill health or dementia, face additional barriers that may hinder their participation in research.

methodsThis paper contributes timely critical commentary on methodological and ethical approaches to engaging under-represented people in research. We draw on our experiences and reflections from a study of social exclusion of people aged 80 years and older living alone in government housing in Melbourne, Australia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We suggest key factors to facilitate representation of this population group in future research. These factors include using doorknocking to gain access, cultivating trust with participants and gatekeepers, and conducting face-to-face home interviews. We also interrogate ethical and safety issues for researchers and oldest old participants including the potential for informed consent protocols to exclude this population group.

conclusionTo avoid unintentionally excluding the oldest old, researchers need to consider older persons' self-determination and advocate for methods that ensure oldest old perspectives inform future healthy ageing planning and reduce possible health and well-being inequities.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMalePersonal AutonomyResearcher-Subject RelationsResearch SubjectsVictoriaVulnerable Populations80 and olderagedageismethicsresearchsocial marginalisation

Identifiers

PMID39434254
PMCPMC11671695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.