SynthesisThe clinical respiratory journal2024
The Relationship of Vitamin A and Neonatal Respiratory Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in The clinical respiratory journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin A and Its Related Diseases.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Metabolomics profiling of hypervitaminosis A in South African preschoolers is characterised by modified serum lysophospholipids and oxylipins.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Correction to "The Relationship of Vitamin A and Neonatal Respiratory Diseases: A Meta-Analysis".The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Article
- Elevated KLF2 and YKL-40 with reduced vitamin A as predictive biomarkers for severity and prognosis in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study systematically analyzes the relationship of vitamin A on the neonatal respiratory diseases. An extensive literature search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and so on. After screening in strict accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles on vitamin A deficiency and 12 articles on vitamin A supplementation were included. Stata 17.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis, heterogeneity test, and sensitivity analysis, and the corresponding mathematical model was used to merge the data. The meta-analysis results of the relationship between vitamin A deficiency and neonatal respiratory diseases indicated that compared with the neonates with normal vitamin A, the neonates with vitamin A deficiency had adverse health outcomes of neonatal respiratory diseases (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 2.68-8.84), of which neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) (OR = 4.10, 95% CI: 2.32-7.23) and neonatal pneumonia (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 2.18-4.77) were analyzed by subgroup analysis. The meta-analysis of the relationship between vitamin A supplementation therapy and neonatal respiratory diseases showed that vitamin A supplementation was an effective therapeutic measure for neonatal respiratory diseases (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.07): NRDS (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) and NBPD (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15). The funnel chart method results show that there was publication bias in studies on vitamin A deficiency induced to and vitamin A supplementation therapy for neonatal respiratory diseases. The sensitivity analysis results showed that excluding some special article had some effect on the final pooled effect. But generally speaking, the result of meta-analysis was stable. There is a statistical correlation of vitamin A on the neonatal respiratory diseases from two aspects of etiological exploration and effect evaluation of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.