Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434142›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2024

High-cost users after sepsis: a population-based observational cohort study.

Kali A Barrett, Fatima Sheikh, Victoria Chechulina, Hannah Chung, Peter Dodek, Laura Rosella, Kednapa Thavorn, Damon C Scales, Sepsis Canada

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Healthcare costs after sepsis: a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kali A BarrettInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. kali.barrett@uhn.ca.
Fatima SheikhDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Victoria ChechulinaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Hannah ChungICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter DodekCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes and Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Laura RosellaICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Damon C ScalesInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sepsis Canada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-cost users (HCU) represent important targets for health policy interventions. Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome that is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and economic costs to the healthcare system. We sought to estimate the effect of sepsis on being a subsequent HCU.

methodsUsing linked health-administrative databases, we conducted a population-based, propensity score-weighted cohort study of adults who survived a hospitalization in Ontario, Canada between January 2016 and December 2017. Sepsis was identified using a validated algorithm. The primary outcome was being a persistent HCU after hospital discharge (in the top 5% or 1% of total health care spending for 90 consecutive days), and the proportion of follow-up time since discharge as a HCU.

resultsWe identified 927,057 hospitalized individuals, of whom 79,065 had sepsis. Individuals who had sepsis were more likely to be a top 5% HCU for 90 consecutive days at any time after discharge compared to those without sepsis (OR 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-2.46) and spent on average 42.3% of their follow up time as a top 5% HCU compared to 28.9% of time among those without sepsis (RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.45-1.48). Individuals with sepsis were more likely to be a top 1% HCU for 90 consecutive days compared to those without sepsis (10% versus 5.1%, OR 2.05 [95% CI 1.99-2.11]), and spent more time as a top 1% HCU (18.5% of time versus 10.8% of time, RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.65-1.70]).

conclusionsThe sequelae of sepsis result in higher healthcare costs with important economic implications. After discharge, individuals who experienced sepsis are more likely to be a HCU and spend more time as a HCU compared to individuals who did not experience sepsis during hospitalization.

Indexed as

SepsisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPropensity ScoreHealthcare costsHealthcare utilizationHigh-cost usersSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39434142
PMCPMC11492703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.