Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434117›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings.

Louise M Wallace, Mari Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Louise M WallaceFaculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-0580
Mari GreenfieldFaculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK. mari.greenfield@open.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3594-0399

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 131322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth and social care employees may be involved in professional regulatory proceedings because their alleged behaviour raises health or conduct concerns. Employees, patients or service users may also be involved in a regulatory tribunal as witnesses. This study is about the role of employers in supporting them in this process.

methodsTaking an organisational support perspective, we interviewed 25 senior employees in health and social care organisations in the UK who are responsible for managing the employer's role in the proceedings. Template analysis was used to analyse the transcripts.

resultsSupport for patients was limited to that offered during an employer's complaints process, and only one employer gave some support during the regulatory process if the patient or service user initiated regulatory proceedings. Support for employees in tribunals was little different to that offered during an initial investigation by the employer. However, where additional support for being involved in a regulatory tribunal was offered to employees, it most often came from the senior employees' own experience of the stressfulness of being a witness in these proceedings. Employers were not aware of training resources that would better support their employees to engage with professional regulatory proceedings.

conclusionsEmployers offer limited support to employees who are involved in professional regulatory proceedings, and the support offered may depend more on senior employee's individual experience of involvement in regulatory proceedings to exercise this discretion. Patients, service users and other public witnesses receive almost no support from health and social care employers during professional regulatory proceedings.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial WorkUnited KingdomFitness to practiseRegistrantRegulation

Identifiers

PMID39434117
PMCPMC11494793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.