Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434088›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Classifying disorders of consciousness using a novel dual-level and dual-modal graph learning model.

Zengxin Qi, Wenwen Zeng, Di Zang, Zhe Wang, Lanqin Luo, Xuehai Wu, Jinhua Yu, Ying Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zengxin Qi *Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Wenwen Zeng *School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Di Zang *Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China. zangdizhbjig@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-2747
Zhe WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Lanqin LuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Xuehai WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China. wuxuehai2013@163.com.
Jinhua YuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jhyu@fudan.edu.cn.
Ying MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200030, China. maoying@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271224National Natural Science Foundation of China 91959127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisorders of consciousness (DoC) are a group of conditions that affect the level of awareness and communication in patients. While neuroimaging techniques can provide useful information about the brain structure and function in these patients, most existing methods rely on a single modality for analysis and rarely account for brain injury. To address these limitations, we propose a novel method that integrates two neuroimaging modalities, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), to enhance the classification of subjects into different states of consciousness. METHOD AND

resultsThe main contributions of our work are threefold: first, after constructing a dual-model individual graph using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), we introduce a brain injury mask mechanism that consolidates damaged brain regions into a single graph node, enhancing the modeling of brain injuries and reducing deformation effects. Second, to address over-smoothing, we construct a dual-level graph that dynamically construct a population-level graph with node features from individual graphs, to promote the clustering of similar subjects while distinguishing dissimilar ones. Finally, we employ a subgraph exploration model with task-fMRI data to validate the interpretability of our model, confirming that the selected brain regions are task-relevant in cognition. Our experimental results on data from 89 healthy participants and 204 patients with DoC from Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, demonstrate that our method achieves high accuracy in classifying patients into unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), or normal conscious state, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods. The explainability results of our method identified a subset of brain regions that are important for consciousness, such as the default mode network, the salience network, the dorsal attention network, and the visual network. Our method also revealed the relationship between brain networks and language processing in consciousness, and showed that language-related subgraphs can distinguish MCS from UWS patients.

conclusionWe proposed a novel graph learning method for classifying DoC based on fMRI and DTI data, introducing a brain injury mask mechanism to effectively handle damaged brains. The classification results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in distinguishing subjects across different states of consciousness, while the explainability results identify key brain regions relevant to this classification. Our study provides new evidence for the role of brain networks and language processing in consciousness, with potential implications for improving the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with DoC.

Indexed as

Consciousness DisordersDiffusion Tensor ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39434088
PMCPMC11492684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.