SynthesisBMC cancer2024
Advancing personalized oncology: a systematic review on the integration of artificial intelligence in monitoring neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer patients.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An NLP-Driven Framework for Automated Radiology-Pathology Concordance Assessment in Breast Biopsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A 10-Year ClinicalTrials.gov-Based Analysis Across the Cancer Control Continuum.Cancers · 2025Review
- Inflammatory blood markers in breast cancer: a narrative review from early detection to therapy response.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Application of deep learning models in the pathological classification and staging of esophageal cancer: A focus on Wave-Vision Transformer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Oncology: A Review of Current Trends and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite suffering from the same disease, each patient exhibits a distinct microbiological profile and variable reactivity to prescribed treatments. Most doctors typically use a standardized treatment approach for all patients suffering from a specific disease. Consequently, the challenge lies in the effectiveness of this standardized treatment and in adapting it to each individual patient. Personalized medicine is an emerging field in which doctors use diagnostic tests to identify the most effective medical treatments for each patient. Prognosis, disease monitoring, and treatment planning rely on manual, error-prone methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) uses predictive techniques capable of automating prognostic and monitoring processes, thus reducing the error rate associated with conventional methods.
methodsThis paper conducts an analysis of current literature, encompassing the period from January 2015 to 2023, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
resultsIn assessing 25 pertinent studies concerning predicting neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) response in breast cancer (BC) patients, the studies explored various imaging modalities (Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, etc.), evaluating results based on accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve. Additionally, the technologies employed, such as machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), statistics, and hybrid models, were scrutinized. The presentation of datasets used for predicting complete pathological response (PCR) was also considered.
conclusionThis paper seeks to unveil crucial insights into the application of AI techniques in personalized oncology, particularly in the monitoring and prediction of responses to NAT for BC patients. Finally, the authors suggest avenues for future research into AI-based monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.