Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39434041›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2024

Open versus mini-invasive partial and radical nephrectomy complications: results from the French national health database.

Guillaume Pascal, Pascal Eschwège, Julia Salleron, Beverley Balkau, Jacques Hubert, Charles Mazeaud

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillaume PascalDepartment of Urology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France. g.pascal@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-6093
Pascal EschwègeDepartment of Urology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France.
Julia SalleronDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Beverley BalkauClinical Epidemiology, CESP, Paris-Saclay University, UVSQ, Inserm, Villejuif, France.
Jacques HubertDepartment of Urology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France.
Charles MazeaudDepartment of Urology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower morbidity than open surgery. No recent data compared kidney cancer surgery in the French population using the National Health Insurance database (PMSI-MCO).

aimsWe explore and compare the surgical morbidity rates between laparoscopic and open laparotomy for kidney cancer.

methodsThe initial length of stay and complications parameters during the three postoperative months were described for renal cancer in every French center in 2018. We compared Relative Risks (RR [95% CI]) between laparoscopic and open surgery for both radical and partial nephrectomy.

resultsAmong 8,162 patients, 3,525 had a radical nephrectomy, 978 open, 2,547 laparoscopic surgeries; 4,637 patients had partial nephrectomies, 1,778 open 2,859 laparoscopic surgeries. For radical surgery, the most common complications were urinary infections (7.8%), acute renal failure (8.9%), sepsis (8.4%), bleeding (9.3%), and postoperative anemia (5.9%); the RR for laparoscopic versus open surgery were respectively 0.68 [0.54;0.86], 0.71 [0.57;0.88], 0.69 [0.55;0.86], 0.83 [0.66;1.03], 0.56 [0.43;0.73]. For partial nephrectomies, the most common complications were urinary infections (7.7%), bleeding (11.6%), and postoperative anemia (5.8%), with RR of 0.71 [0.58;0.87], 0.61 [0.52;0.71], and 0.64 [0.51;0.81]. The mean length of stay was 7.7 for open radical nephrectomy, 6.3 for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, 7.5 for open partial nephrectomy, and 5 for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

conclusionsThe laparoscopic approach had fewer postoperative complications and a shorter length of stay than open surgery for partial and radical nephrectomy. The PMSI analysis provided an exhaustive description of surgical practice for kidney cancer and surgical complications in France. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleFranceHumansLaparotomyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedComplicationsKidneyLaparoscopyNeoplasiaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39434041
PMCPMC11492573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.