ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Epidemiology and characteristics of unintentional self-inflicted penetrating ocular injuries in children less than 6 years-old.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of pediatric ocular injuries in Poland: cross-sectional study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPediatric ocular injuries, notably unintentional self-inflicted penetrating ocular injuries in children under 6, pose a substantial public health concern, leading to visual impairment and psychological distress. With global prevalence indicating severe visual impairment or blindness in 2-14% of affected children, these injuries necessitate multiple surgeries and extended monitoring. Our study aims to analyze the epidemiology and characteristics of such injuries, emphasizing preventive measures, parental supervision, and timely medical intervention to mitigate their impact on young lives.
methodConducted at Khalili Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, our retrospective study included 141 cases admitted between April 2018 and April 2023. Ethical principles guided data collection from medical records, encompassing demographic details, causative objects, ocular laceration specifics, surgical procedures, complications, and visual acuity assessments.
resultsThe mean age of the participants in this study was 47.18 ± 16.48 months (ranging from 10 to 71 months), and the male to female ratio was 1.76:1 (90 vs. 51). Objects of injury mostly included knives (34.8%), wood (12.1%), and glass (10.6%), and the most common initial manifestation of injury was iris prolapse (56.7%), followed by traumatic cataract (46.8%) and limbus laceration (34.0%). Fifteen (10.6%) patients had a visual acuity better than LogMAR 0.5, 24 (17.1%) had finger count vision, 37 (26.2%) had hand motion, 7 (0.5%) had light perception, and 58 (41.1%) were uncooperative. Type of laceration and season of injury were associated with retinal detachment, and a longer time-to-visit was correlated with a higher risk of developing retinal detachment or endophthalmitis.
conclusionOur study highlights the significant burden of unintentional self-inflicted penetrating ocular injuries in children under 6. Emphasizing preventive measures, parental supervision, and timely medical intervention, our findings underscore the potential psychological and visual consequences. This research advocates for parental education and safety measures to reduce the occurrence and severity of such injuries in this vulnerable population, promoting a healthier and safer environment for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.