ArticleBMC cancer2024
Effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of docetaxel and ramucirumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment-related Cognitive Impairment, Neurovascular Coupling, and Iron Levels in Women with Ovarian Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDocetaxel (DOC) and ramucirumab (RAM) is one of the most effective regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. In our previous study, baseline anemia was identified as a preventive factor against the development of severe adverse effects during the first treatment cycle. It was hypothesized that anemia directly promotes tumor angiogenesis, leading to the elevation of RAM efficacy with increased DOC delivery to tumors, while reducing DOC delivery to other organs, potentially mitigating severe adverse effects. If this hypothesis is correct, patients with baseline anemia may have better clinical outcomes than those with normal hemoglobin levels. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of baseline anemia on the efficacy of DOC + RAM in treating advanced NSCLC in a real-word setting.
methodsPatients with advanced NSCLC receiving DOC + RAM (n = 72) were retrospectively assessed. They were categorized into a control group with normal baseline hemoglobin levels and an anemia group with baseline anemia. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluation.
resultsPatients in the anemia group had a significantly shorter PFS than that of patients in the control group (median PFS: 3.2 and 6.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-4.8 and 4.3-9.9 months, respectively;P = 0.008). In addition, the disease control rate in the anemia group was 65.8%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (93.6%; P = 0.007). Overall survival tended to be shorter in patients with anemia than in controls, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.07). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis suggested that baseline anemia was a singular risk factor for poor PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.08-3.13; P = 0.02). The incidence of severe adverse effects did not differ between the two groups.
conclusionsThis study suggests that the PFS of patients with anemia treated with DOC + RAM for advanced NSCLC is shorter than that of those without the symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.