Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Assessment of renal artery stenosis using renal fractional flow reserve and correlation with angiography and color Doppler ultrasonography: data from FAIR-pilot trial.
Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05732077 (Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the ApproprIateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renovascular Hypertension Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the ApproprIateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renovascular Hypertension Patients: a Pilot Randomized Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting Fibromuscular Dysplasia-Related Renal Artery Stenosis: CTA or Doppler US?Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- A doppler ultrasound-based model for predicting blood pressure response after revascularization in unilateral severe renal artery stenosis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Beyond Cholesterol: Emerging Risk Factors in Atherosclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal fractional flow reserve (rFFR), a hemodynamic evaluation indicator for functional measurement, could be used for the detection of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). In this study, we evaluated the correlation between color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU), angiography and rFFR in assessing RAS and to validate cut-off points of ultrasound parameters for significant RAS with rFFR<0.8. A total of 77 renal artery lesions from 58 patients with at least unilateral RAS were included into this study. All patients were participated in Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Percutaneous Renal Artery Intervention in Atherosclerosis Renal Hypertension Patients (FAIR)-pilot study (NCT05732077). The rFFR was measured through a pressure wire after renal hyperemia induced by dopamine. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-to-aortic ratio (RAR), resistive index (RI) and side-to-side differences of the intrarenal resistive indices (ΔRI) were obtained by CDU. The rFFR showed good correlation with both CDU and angiography assessment methods. Among CDU parameters, the best correlation was observed in rFFR with PSV (rho = -0.668, P < 0.0001) and RAR (rho = -0.597, P < 0.001). With a rFFR<0.80 as cut-off value for significant RAS, we computed sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of CDU parameters. The most predicting cut-off points of CDU parameters were calculated as PSV for 2.415 m/s, RAR for 4.495, RI for 0.605 and ΔRI for 0.04, respectively. A PSV > 2.415 m/s provided a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 75%, accuracy of 81% and AUC of 0.84 for detecting RAS with rFFR<0.8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39433968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.