Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433964›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Paediatric e-scooter riders at high risk of life-threatening traffic accidents.

Andrea Schuller, Anna Hohensteiner, Thomas Sator, Lorenz Pichler, Manuela Jaindl, Elisabeth Schwendenwein, Thomas Manfred Tiefenboeck, Stephan Payr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea SchullerUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anna HohensteinerUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas SatorUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lorenz PichlerUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Manuela JaindlUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth SchwendenweinUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas Manfred TiefenboeckUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan PayrUniversity Clinic of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. stephan.payr@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study presents the epidemiology and the development of e-scooter and non-electric scooter injuries in children and adolescents to highlight the nature and the severity of such injuries.

methodsAll children and adolescents with electric or non-electric scooter related injuries between January 2019 until December 2022 were included in this single-centre study and retrospectively evaluated. An epidemiological overview including age, sex, type of scooter, injury mechanism, diagnosed injuries and surgical interventions were presented. Further, statistical comparisons of the means and proportions of injuries and the number of surgical interventions between electric and non-electric scooter riders were made.

resultsThe study consists of 633 children and adolescents (9.1 ± 5.0 years; 231 female, 36.5%, 402 male, 63.5%). 80.1% (8.0 ± 4.1 years) used non-electric scooters, while 19.9% (14.2 ± 4.1 years) used e-scooters. In comparison, adolescent e-scooter riders were significantly more likely to be involved in traffic accidents (non-electric scooter: 16/507; e-scooter: 21/126; p = 0.0001) and suffered severe head injuries more often (non-electric scooter: 8/134; e-scooter: 7/37; p = 0.0217) than patients riding non-electric scooters.

conclusionAdolescent e-scooter riders were more likely to be involved in potentially life-threatening traffic accidents having a higher risk of severe head injuries requiring surgery compared to non-electric scooter riders. IMPACT: Adolescent e-scooter riders have a higher risk to be involved in potentially life-threatening traffic accidents than riders of non-electric scooters. E-scooter riders have a higher risk of sustaining serious head injuries requiring surgical intervention than non-electric scooter riders. The data highly recommends the implementation of prevention strategies especially educating youth and parents and wearing protective clothing. Legislation and law enforcement could help prevent such injuries and potentially life-threatening traffic accidents involving children and adolescents who ride e-scooters.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficWounds and InjuriesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.