Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433950›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2024

Design principles, growth laws, and competition of minimal autocatalysts.

Yann Sakref, Olivier Rivoire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yann SakrefGulliver, CNRS, ESPCI, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8083-7510
Olivier RivoireGulliver, CNRS, ESPCI, Université PSL, Paris, France. olivier.rivoire@espci.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-22-CE06-0037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The difficulty of designing simple autocatalysts that grow exponentially in the absence of enzymes, external drives or ingenious internal mechanisms severely constrains scenarios for the emergence of evolution by natural selection in chemical and physical systems. Here, we systematically analyze these difficulties in the simplest and most generic autocatalyst: a dimeric molecule that duplicates by templated ligation. We show that despite its simplicity, such an autocatalyst can achieve exponential growth autonomously. We also show, however, that it is possible to design as simple sub-exponential autocatalysts that have an advantage over exponential autocatalysts when competing for a common resource. We reach these conclusions by developing a theoretical framework based on kinetic barrier diagrams. Besides challenging commonly accepted assumptions in the field of the origin of life, our results provide a blueprint for the experimental realization of elementary autocatalysts exhibiting a form of natural selection, whether on a molecular or colloidal scale.

Identifiers

PMID39433950
PMCPMC11494078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.