ArticleScientific reports2024
A central and peripheral dual neuromodulation strategy in pain management of zoster-associated pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term peripheral nerve stimulation or pulsed radiofrequency in elderly patients with acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus: multi-center retrospective study.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Developing a Core Outcome Set for Herpes Zoster-Associated Neuralgia in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Study Protocol.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Causal Brain Network Alterations Across Disease Stages in Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency versus spinal cord stimulation in thoracic herpes zoster pain: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pulsed Radiofrequency Relieves Neuropathic Pain by Repairing the Ultrastructural Damage of Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglion.Neuroscience insights · 2025Article
- The efficacy and prognosis analysis of short-term spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of zoster-associated pain: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown effectiveness in relieving zoster-associated pain (ZAP), but some patients still experience moderate or severe pain after SCS treatment. This study aims to evaluate the impact of SCS combined with dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) as a dual neuromodulation strategy on the prognosis of ZAP. The clinical records of patients diagnosed with ZAP who underwent SCS (SCS group) or SCS combined with PRF (SCS + PRF group) at The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, were retrospectively analyzed to compare the effectiveness of the two treatment approaches for ZAP. Outcome measures included changes in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores before and after neuromodulation treatment, response rates, and incidence of progression to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).13 SCS patients and 15 SCS + PRF patients were analyzed. Admission VAS scores were similar (P = 0.934). Upon discharge, no significant differences in VAS or response rates were observed (P > 0.05). However, at 6-month follow-up, the SCS + PRF group had lower VAS scores (1.53 ± 1.06 vs. 3.23 ± 1.50, P < 0.001) and a lower proportion of residual moderate pain (P = 0.041). None in the SCS + PRF group progressed to PHN in the acute/subacute phases, differing significantly from the SCS group (P = 0.038).Therefore, SCS combined with DRG PRF is feasible and effective in the treatment of ZAP. This dual neuromodulation strategy may be a more appropriate regimen for the treatment of ZAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.