ArticleScientific reports2024
Landscape of the immune infiltration and identification of molecular diagnostic markers associated with immune cells in patients with kidney transplantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting VAMP5 suppresses PLK1-driven growth of gliomas with high NDRG4 expression.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Innate-immune crosstalk orchestrates T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplants.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Exploring Chronic Rejection in Organ Transplantation Through Computational Modeling.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rejection seriously affects the success of kidney transplantations. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this rejection remain unclear. The GSE21374 and GSE36059 datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Next, the Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) algorithm was used to infer the proportions of 22 immune cells. Moreover, infiltrating immune cell-related genes were identified using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and enrichment analysis was conducted to observe their biological functions. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithms were used to screen hub genes. Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted to verify the number of immune cells and hub gene expression levels. The rejection and non-rejection groups showed significantly different distributions (P < 0.05) of eight immune cells (B cell memory, Plasma cells, mast cells, follicular helper T cells, T CD8 cells, Macrophages M1, T Cells CD4 memory activated, and gamma delta T cells). Subsequently, CD8A, CRTAM, GBP2, WARS, and VAMP5 were screened as hub genes using the XGBoost and LASSO algorithms and could be used as diagnostic biomarkers. Finally, differential analysis and quantitative real-time PCR suggested that CD8A, CRTAM, GBP2, WARS, and VAMP5 were upregulated in rejection samples compared to non-rejection samples. The present study identified five key infiltrating immune cell-related genes (CD8A, CRTAM, GBP2,WARS, and VAMP5) involved in kidney transplant rejection, which may explain the molecular mechanism of rejection in kidney transplantation development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.