ArticleScientific reports2024
Real-world analysis of safety, tolerability, and adherence to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (paxlovid) in primary care COVID-19 outpatients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacist follow-up of patients prescribed nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: a single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
- Drug-related problems and challenges encountered by pharmacists in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir counselling during the covid-19 pandemic: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-World Experience with the Available Outpatient COVID-19 THErapies in Patients with canceR (CO.THER).Cancers · 2025Article
- Real-World Analysis of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Based on the Hospital Prescription Analysis (HPA) Database in 9 Cities of China.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and adherence of patients prescribed Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) in outpatient settings, focusing on its use in managing category 2 COVID-19 patients across three primary healthcare clinics in Selangor, Malaysia. Data were collected from the Paxlovid pharmacy registry and medical records at Klinik Kesihatan Seksyen 7, Klinik Kesihatan Seksyen 19, and Klinik Kesihatan Kelana Jaya between April 1, 2022, and November 30, 2022. This study analysed data from 415 category 2 COVID-19 patients aged ≥ 18 years. The primary and secondary outcomes included the assessment of patient demographics, Paxlovid dosing, current medication, changes in drug regimen, adherence, and adverse drug reactions (ADR). Pharmacists follow-ups were conducted on days 3 and 5 post-medication initiation. The majority (79.5%) of the cohort experienced ADR, predominantly dysgeusia, diarrhoea, body ache, vomiting, and nausea. Despite this, the ADRs were generally well-tolerated, with no severe impacts reported. High adherence was observed, with 96.9% of patients completing the 5-day regimen. The primary reasons for non-adherence included adverse effect intolerability, dosing ambiguity, forgetfulness, concerns about ADR, and perceived health improvement. Notable medications interacting with Paxlovid were simvastatin, amlodipine, and atorvastatin, and 21.7% of 23 concurrent medications were found not to comply with the recommended interventions by the University of Liverpool COVID-19 Drug Interaction database. Paxlovid demonstrates a high level of safety and tolerability in outpatient COVID-19 patients, with optimal adherence observed. This study underscores the vital role of healthcare professionals in managing Paxlovid within primary healthcare and highlights the need for broader research and direct patient involvement to enhance treatment strategies against COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.