ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of the status and influencing factors of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom heterogeneity and factors associated with dignity-related distress in older adults with incontinence-associated dermatitis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean version of the Intensive care unit Dignified Care Questionnaire (IDCQ).BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Unraveling family resilience patterns in ICU first-episode stroke: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Adaptation and validation of Spanish version of the Inpatient Dignity Scale in hospitalized patients: a psychometric study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Latent profile analysis of fatalism and its influencing factors among community-dwelling disabled elderly individuals.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the status of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment and conduct a systematic analysis of its influencing factors, aiming to provide reference for clinical medical decision-making by healthcare professionals. A cross-sectional survey study. From April 15th to 21st, 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 40 tertiary Grade A comprehensive hospitals in 9 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions including Sichuan Province, Zhejiang Province, and Chongqing Municipality. Various critically ill patients who were admitted to ICU treatment were surveyed using a general information questionnaire and the Dignity Inventory. A total of 346 questionnaires were collected in this survey, with 333 valid questionnaires and an effective response rate of 96%. The incidence rate of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment was 39%. Multifactor logistic regression analysis showed that age [OR = 1.124, 95%CI=(1.067-1.184)], frequency of visits [OR = 1.875, 95%CI=(1.075-3.269)], length of ICU stay [OR = 1.352, 95%CI=(1.108-1.649)], and tracheotomy upon discharge [OR = 2.269, 95%CI=(1.273-4.044)] were risk factors for dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment. Number of children [OR = 0.247, 95%CI=(0.106-0.576)] was a protective factor for dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment. Although the incidence of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment is relatively low, the psychological trauma it causes cannot be ignored. Healthcare professionals must actively establish and improve its prevention and management system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.