ArticleScientific reports2024
Predictive machine learning models for anticipating loss to follow-up in tuberculosis patients throughout anti-TB treatment journey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate change impact on disease emergence and antimicrobial resistance: A perspective on transmission and detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence approaches to predicting treatment non-adherence in chronic diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Developing a prediction model for poor prognosis in MPA patients using initial admission examination results: a machine learning study from Southwest China.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Identification of risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection in Xinjiang using machine learning.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Machine learning approaches to predicting medication nonadherence: a scoping review.International journal of medical informatics · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota and tuberculosis.iMeta · 2025Review
- Elevated Serum TNF-α/IL-1β Levels and Under-Nutrition Predict Early Mortality and Hospital Stay Burden in Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loss to follow-up (LTFU) in tuberculosis (TB) management increases morbidity and mortality, challenging effective control strategies. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict loss to follow-up in TB patients, improving treatment adherence and outcomes. Retrospective data encompassing tuberculosis patients who underwent treatment or registration at the National Center for Clinical Medical Research on Infectious Diseases from January 2017 to December 2021 were compiled. Employing machine learning techniques, namely SVM, RF, XGBoost, and logistic regression, the study aimed to prognosticate LTFU. A comprehensive cohort of 24,265 tuberculosis patients underwent scrutiny, revealing a LTFU prevalence of 12.51% (n = 3036). Education level, history of hospitalization, alcohol consumption, outpatient admission, and prior tuberculosis history emerged as precursors for pre-treatment LTFU. Employment status, outpatient admission, presence of chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis, drug adverse reactions, alternative contact availability, and health insurance coverage exerted substantial influence on treatment-phase LTFU. XGBoost consistently surpassed alternative models, boasting superior discriminative ability with an average AUC of 0.921 for pre-treatment LTFU and 0.825 for in-treatment LTFU. Our study demonstrates that the XGBoost model provides superior predictive performance in identifying LTFU risk among tuberculosis patients. The identification of key risk factors highlights the importance of targeted interventions, which could lead to significant improvements in treatment adherence and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.