Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Integrating machine learning and bioinformatics approaches for identifying novel diagnostic gene biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Ayoub Vaziri-Moghadam, Mohammad-Hadi Foroughmand-Araabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel biological function-based method for mining core genes in rare disease with limited cases.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayoub Vaziri-MoghadamDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Hadi Foroughmand-AraabiDepartment of Mathematical Science, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. foroughmand@sharif.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify diagnostic gene biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC) by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in tumor and adjacent normal samples across five colon cancer gene-expression profiles (GSE10950, GSE25070, GSE41328, GSE74602, GSE142279) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Intersecting identified DEGs with the module with the highest correlation to gene expression patterns of tumor samples in the gene co-expression network analysis revealed 283 overlapped genes. Centrality measures were calculated for these genes in the reconstructed STRING protein-protein interaction network. Applying LASSO logistic regression, eleven genes were ultimately recognized as candidate diagnostic genes. Among these genes, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values for nine genes (CDC25B, CDK4, IQGAP3, MMP1, MMP7, SLC7A5, TEAD4, TRIB3, and UHRF1) surpassed the threshold of 0.92 in both the training and validation sets. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these genes with four machine learning algorithms: random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). In the testing dataset (GSE21815 and GSE106582), the AUROC scores were greater than 0.95 for all of the machine learning algorithms, indicating the high diagnostic performance of the nine genes. Besides, these nine genes are also significantly correlated to twelve immune cells, namely Mast cells activated, Macrophages M0, M1, and M2, Neutrophils, T cells CD4 memory activated, T cells follicular helper, T cells CD8, T cells CD4 memory resting, B cells memory, Plasma cells, and Mast cells resting (P < 0.05). These results strongly suggest that all of the nine genes have the potential to serve as reliable diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMachine LearningProtein Interaction MapsDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansROC CurveBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39433800
PMCPMC11494190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.