Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39433775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus derived postbiotics on growth metrics, Health, and Gut Integrity in broiler chickens.

M Monika, Jagbir Singh Tyagi, Nagesh Sonale, Avishek Biswas, Dinesh Murali, Sky, A K Tiwari, Jaydip Jaywant Rokade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Effects of Complementary Feed with Postbiotics Derived fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Low-Protein-Fed Chickens Benefit from ProbioticAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M MonikaICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, 825405, India.
Jagbir Singh TyagiICAR- Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India. jbstyagi@gmail.com.
Nagesh SonaleICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India.
Avishek BiswasICAR- Central Institute for Research on Cattle, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, 250001, India.
Dinesh MuraliICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India.
SkyICAR- Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India.
A K TiwariICAR- Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India.
Jaydip Jaywant RokadeICAR- Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, India. jaydeepvet@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous use of antibiotics in poultry feed as growth promoters poses a grave threat to humanity through the emergence of antibiotic resistance, necessitating the exploration of novel and sustainable alternatives. The present study was carried out to evaluate the performance of postbiotics derived from Lactobacillus acidophilus in broiler birds. The postbiotics were harvested by culturing probiotic bacteria from the stock cultures at the required temperature and duration under laboratory conditions and supplemented to broilers via feed. For experimentation, 480-day-old CARI-Bro Dhanraja (slow-growing broiler) straight-run chicks were randomly split up into six groups. Treatment groups diets are as follows: T1- Basal diet (BD)+0.2%(v/w) MRS Broth/ uninoculated media; T2 - BD + Antibiotic (CTC); T3- BD + Probiotic; T4, T5 & T6 - BD + postbiotics supplementation of 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.6% (v/w) respectively. The chicks were raised under an intensive, deep litter system with standard protocol for 6 weeks. Results showed that 0.2% of postbiotics (T4) had significantly (P < 0.001) higher body weight (1677.52 g) with better FCR (1.75) and immune response. Postbiotic supplementation altered various serum attributes positively, in this study. Significant (P < 0.001) reductions in total plate counts (TPC), coliform counts, and maximum Lactobacillus counts were recorded in all postbiotic-supplemented groups. The villus height (1379.25 μm), width (216.06 μm) and crept depth (179.25 μm) showed significant (P < 0.001) improvement among the treatment groups on the 21st and 42nd day of the experimental trial, with the highest value in the T4 group (0.2% postbiotic supplementation). Jejunal antioxidant values also noted significantly (P < 0.001) higher values in T4 group. The study concludes that 0.2% postbiotic supplementation can act as a substitute to antibiotic growth promoters and also combat the disfavour activity of probiotics in broilers.

Indexed as

Animal FeedChickensLactobacillus acidophilusProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceBroilersGut healthPostbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39433775
PMCPMC11494069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.